As President Joe Biden’s tenure draws to a close, his administration’s foreign policy legacy is coming under critical scrutiny, especially regarding its impact on the Middle East and global terrorism. Recent moves by the administration reflect a troubling pattern of actions that many argue have empowered terrorist organizations at the expense of American interests and allies.
The administration’s recent announcement by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) to allocate another $230 million in taxpayer dollars to Gaza reportedly aimed at supporting economic recovery, stands as a prime example. Since 2021, USAID has spent $600 million on economic support for the Palestinian people and over $2.1 billion in humanitarian aid since October 2023. Under the Biden administration, this financial support comes at a time when Palestinian terrorist activities have intensified, adding fuel to the argument that these funds are indirectly bolstering organizations like Hamas, rather than aiding the civilians they intend to support.
Moreover, Biden’s approach appears to have sidelined U.S. allies, notably Israel. Sanctions against Israel, particularly those associated with settlements in the West Bank, underscore a perceived bias in the administration’s policy. While these actions align with some progressive elements within Biden’s party, they have led to allegations that Biden’s measures embolden those who threaten regional stability. It wasn’t until later that the administration took steps to sanction Hamas leaders, suggesting a reluctance to confront the core issues head-on.
Adding to the critique of Biden’s foreign policy is the precedent set by the catastrophic withdrawal from Afghanistan. This withdrawal saw the Taliban, once again, reclaim the country alongside $7 billion worth of U.S. military equipment, a decision many view as one of the most glaring failures of Biden’s time in office. The administration’s decision to unfreeze $6 billion in Iranian assets in exchange for hostages further illustrates a willingness to compromise on principles, a move which sparked significant controversy.
Biden’s actions in other areas also have implications for national security. His open border policy, by allowing an influx of migrants without thorough vetting, has raised security concerns about potential terrorist operatives entering the United States undetected, further complicating the country’s anti-terrorism efforts.
Throughout his presidency, Biden’s policies have arguably left terrorist organizations in a stronger position than before, creating a paradox where U.S. taxpayer dollars may inadvertently support activities contrary to national security. His administration’s priorities suggest an inherent weakness in dealing with these threats, raising questions about the long-term impact of these policies on America’s standing and security in the world.
As he steps down, the impact of his administration’s actions will continue to be felt, leaving Americans to ponder the true cost of such a foreign policy approach. The discourse surrounding Biden’s legacy will shape future debates on how the nation balances foreign aid, national security, and its alliances, setting the stage for significant policy reassessment in the years ahead.
