As the 2024 presidential election approaches, Border Patrol agents have expressed significant concerns over the prospect of a Kamala Harris presidency, voicing their distrust firmly and unequivocally. These testimonies reveal deep frustration with the current administration’s approach to border security, highlighting a preference for a different leadership trajectory come November.
In exclusive interviews, more than a dozen Border Patrol agents indicated a stark unwillingness to vote for Harris. Their reasons include seeing her as a radical figure and reflecting negatively on her perceived support of the organization’s core mission. There is palpable fear among the ranks that another term under a Democratic administration, particularly one led by Harris, could exacerbate already troubling trends at the border.
The Biden administration has already faced significant criticism for its handling of border security, with nearly 10 million migrant encounters since January 2021—a historic high. Agents predict that Harris will continue and potentially expand these “failed policies.” The selection of Governor Tim Walz as her running mate, known for his progressive stance on sanctuary policies and immigration reforms, further solidifies their concerns. Walz’s record includes support for policies granting illegal immigrants free college tuition and driver’s licenses, which many Border Patrol agents view as detrimental to national security.
Many agents are contemplating early retirement, perceiving the continuation of Democratic leadership as untenable. The dissatisfaction is not purely professional but often intertwined with personal and religious beliefs. Several agents voiced objections to Harris’s stance on issues like abortion, aligning their overall opposition with their Christian faith.
Moreover, Harris’s past performance as Vice President, notably her role as “Border Czar,” has drawn sharp criticism. Despite being tasked with addressing migration causes from Central American nations, there has been an unprecedented surge of migrants from various parts of the world. Agents note Harris’s lack of engagement, with her failure to visit border areas particularly revealing. Her retort about not visiting Europe, when asked about her border visit plans, remains a sore point for many.
Apart from the operational inefficiencies, morale among Border Patrol agents has deeply suffered under the Biden administration. They lament a shift from guarding against national security threats to what they describe as mere migrant processing tasks, including identifying individuals on the FBI’s terrorist watch list and seizing record amounts of fentanyl. Such shifts have forced agents to take on daunting and extended details away from their families, adding personal strains to their professional burdens.
Despite the adversities, some agents are considering staying on to provide their colleagues a semblance of stability and leadership. They hope to serve as voices of reason and shields against any further administrative blunders that may arise if Harris assumes the presidency. Yet, the overarching sentiment remains of potential disillusionment and skepticism. The ongoing border crisis, coupled with administrative mishandling and perceived radical policy shifts, continues to cast a long shadow over the dedication and future of Border Patrol personnel.
This discourse around border security and immigration policy underscores the urgency and importance of the upcoming election. The decisions made in November will undoubtedly resonate through the ranks of Border Patrol and beyond, shaping the country’s approach to these critical issues for years to come. The agents’ apprehensive outlook serves as a sobering reminder of the complexities and stakes involved in ensuring America’s sovereign integrity and the well-being of its citizens.
Liberty requires eternal vigilance. That's why we work hard to deliver news about issues that threaten your liberty.
