Throughout the formative years of the COVID-19 pandemic, elites wielded their power to implement draconian measures on average Americans while hypocritically disregarding the very restrictions they imposed. The recent revelations surrounding Dr. Jay Varma and his behaviors during this time epitomize this chasm between the ruling class and the everyday citizen.
In December 2020, as families across the country struggled to navigate the suffocating limitations of the pandemic, my friend and I ventured to Colonial Williamsburg. With six children between us, the trip offered a fleeting glimpse of normalcy against a backdrop of mandated isolation. Although many establishments were closed and those that remained open were under stringent mask mandates, the mere act of walking through the streets and appreciating the festive decorations felt like a luxury. Yet, our decision to share this experience publicly was fraught with anxiety, apprehensive about potential backlash for defying the unyielding norms dictated by the authorities.
Contrast our cautious attempt at normalcy with the actions of Jay Varma, the individual responsible for shaping New York City’s COVID response. While families like mine curbed their activities to adhere to public health directives, Varma admitted to participating in drug-fueled sex parties during the same period. New Yorkers were forced to endure rigorous guidelines under his administration, yet it seems Varma saw no issue in flouting these rules for his own indulgences. His actions, described in covert recordings released by political commentator Steven Crowder, reveal a stark hypocrisy and a disturbing lack of concern for the citizens he was supposed to serve.
The sentiment is clear: those in power were unafraid. High-profile figures such as Rep. Nancy Pelosi, who flouted mask mandates for a personal salon visit, and Gov. Gavin Newsom, who dined at the French Laundry while enforcing stringent restrictions on his state’s residents, further illustrate this hypocrisy. Varma’s participation in sex parties adds another layer to this narrative of duplicity. These leaders imposed harsh restrictions, shuttering businesses and relegating children to virtual classrooms, while they continued to live their lives uninhibited.
This glaring double standard raises legitimate questions about the true motives behind the COVID restrictions. Were they genuinely about public health, or a mechanism of control wielded by those who viewed themselves above the rules? This example was personified by the former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Anthony Fauci and former COVID-19 Response Coordinator Deborah Birx. Their policies often resembled an authoritarian approach, employing law enforcement to enforce social distancing, masking, and lockdowns, frequently without solid scientific backing.
The fallout from Varma’s actions led to his dismissal from his private sector role post-city hall tenure. Dr. Vinay Prasad notably criticized Varma’s hypocrisy, contrasting it with the initial tenets of public health that emphasize empowerment and resource provision to facilitate better choices. Instead, the pandemic response often mirrored tyrannical overreach, where non-compliance was met with severe penalties and public shaming, affecting the most vulnerable sections of society disproportionately.
Conversely, some voices like Kristen Brown of *The Atlantic* suggested that openness about such behaviors might have fostered empathy and understanding. However, the call for pandemic amnesty overlooks the inherent injustice and the breach of trust by those who enforced these measures while exempting themselves. It becomes evident that the pandemic restrictions were less about preserving public health and more about wielding power over the populace. Such betrayals illustrate the folly of expecting the public to extend forgiveness to those who never shouldered the burdens they imposed.
The era of COVID-19 unveiled a profound divide between the ruling elites and the American people. While the former enjoyed their escapades behind closed doors, ordinary citizens faced the brunt of restrictions. This poignant episode demands a critical reevaluation of trust and justice as we navigate beyond the pandemic.
Liberty requires eternal vigilance. That's why we work hard to deliver news about issues that threaten your liberty.
