A recent decision by a federal judge has cast significant doubt on the future of the Biden-Harris administration’s Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Program, which has long allocated a portion of federal road contracts to businesses owned by women and racial minorities. The ruling has brought to the forefront questions about the constitutionality and fairness of affirmative action policies in federal contracting.
The origins of the DBE program date back to the 1980s, mandating that around 10% of federal road construction contracts be allocated to women and certain racial minority-owned businesses. This policy was reinforced by the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, a significant piece of legislation signed by President Biden in 2021, which earmarked $37 billion for the DBE program. However, the program has come under legal scrutiny in recent years.
This year, two small businesses challenged the implementation of the DBE program, arguing that it resulted in lost business opportunities. On Monday, Judge Gregory Van Tatenhove ruled in favor of these businesses, stating that the administration could not enforce the DBE’s affirmative action quotas. Judge Tatenhove acknowledged the historical discrimination faced by certain groups but emphasized that the remedy for these injustices must comply with constitutional requirements, specifically the principles of equal protection.
This ruling is part of a broader judicial trend challenging race-based policies. It follows a Supreme Court decision in June 2023 that deemed affirmative action unconstitutional. Additionally, prior federal rulings have mandated that agencies like the Minority Business Development Agency and the Small Business Administration serve all races equally and refrain from race-based contract distribution.
The lawsuit, spearheaded by the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty (WILL), was filed on behalf of Mid-America Milling and Bagshaw Trucking, businesses owned by white males operating in Kentucky and Indiana. Mid-America reported losing out on 82 contracts in Indiana since the beginning of 2022 due to the DBE program. Judge Van Tatenhove noted in his decision that these companies had lost federally funded contracts to DBE firms despite submitting lower bids.
Daniel Lennington, a WILL attorney, remarked that this decision represents a significant setback for the Biden-Harris administration’s equity agenda, which prioritizes race-based programs across various federal initiatives. He indicated that WILL plans to seek a final ruling to prevent any business from being subject to the DBE program, arguing that such policies are ingrained in the fabric of American road building but are fundamentally unconstitutional and harm legitimate businesses.
As the debate over race-based contracting policies continues, the recent ruling underscores the ongoing legal and ideological battles surrounding affirmative action and equal protection under the law. This decision could potentially reshape the landscape of federal contracting and influence how government policies address historical inequalities while adhering to constitutional principles. The outcome of this legal challenge will likely have significant implications for business owners and policymakers alike.
Liberty requires eternal vigilance. That's why we work hard to deliver news about issues that threaten your liberty.
