Vice President Kamala Harris’s portrayal of her upbringing as middle and working-class deserves closer scrutiny, particularly as she presents herself to the American electorate ahead of the 2024 elections. Despite her claims of a modest childhood, evidence suggests a life marked by opportunities and privileges that are far from those typically experienced by middle-class families.
Harris often refers to a humble upbringing, emphasizing her mother’s hard work and modest surroundings. During a recent interview, she reiterated being raised by a single mother who bought a home through savings accrued over many years. However, a detailed examination of her early life reveals situations that many in the middle class rarely encounter. Harris spent portions of her childhood overseas, attended private education institutions, and resided in affluent areas such as Berkeley, California, and later Montreal, Canada.
Even as Harris was born in Oakland, her upbringing unfolded in Berkeley, a predominantly white, liberal area with its residents deeply entrenched in academic circles. Her parents were both graduate students at UC Berkeley, one of the most prestigious public universities globally. Harris minimizes her association with Berkeley, opting instead to claim ties with Oakland to align with its working-class image, avoiding the “San Francisco liberal” label often attributed to her.
The narrative of her childhood is further strained considering her family’s continuous relocations due to her father’s academic appointments across the United States and briefly in the United Kingdom. After her parents’ separation, Harris’s mother, a cancer researcher, moved back to Berkeley. Their living situations in Berkeley were notably advantageous—her childhood included attending a private kindergarten and ballet classes from a world-renowned teacher.
Harris’s portrayal as a participant in a school desegregation busing program is also complex. While she did attend such a program, she also had a private school education, indicative of her family’s higher socioeconomic status. Moreover, Harris’s later move to Montreal involved living in one of the city’s most upscale neighborhoods, further distancing her from the working-class identity she often projects.
Interestingly, Harris’s professional and personal trajectory continued to reflect privileged beginnings. She attended Vanier College in Canada and Howard University, followed by law school at UC Hastings. Upon starting her career, she resided in high-end properties such as a condo overlooking Lake Merritt in Oakland. Additionally, her relationship with powerful California political figure Willie Brown brought further opportunities, including lucrative appointments.
Furthermore, as she ascended in her political career, Harris deliberately distanced herself from the academic and affluent backgrounds of her early life. This rebranding came to the fore when she consciously reframed her biography to emphasize being “born in Oakland” over connections to Berkeley, adjusting her narrative to match the socio-political milieu she aimed to represent.
Her political trajectory saw her acquiring high-value real estate, including selling a luxury condo in Washington, D.C., upon her vice-presidential election win, and maintaining a multi-million dollar home in Brentwood, California. Each move underscores a lifestyle far removed from the middle-class hardships she frequently alludes to.
Thus, Harris’s self-characterization as a product of a middle-class, working family obscures the broader context of her privileged upbringing and the substantial resources available to her throughout her life. This dichotomy between her public persona and private reality raises important questions about transparency and authenticity, particularly as she appeals to voters who resonate with her proclaimed background.
Liberty requires eternal vigilance. That's why we work hard to deliver news about issues that threaten your liberty.
