As the credibility of the mainstream media continues to plummet, it’s crucial to examine the double standards and blatant bias that contribute to this erosion of trust. This decline in faith isn’t surprising when we consider instances such as Donald Trump being wrongfully linked to Project 2025—a Heritage Foundation initiative he neither authored nor endorsed—while Kamala Harris is absolved of her controversial stances from merely a few months ago. Essentially, the media has chosen to ignore or conveniently forget Harris’s radical past as she undergoes political transformation.
Kamala Harris’s narrative shift has been remarkable. Having previously supported initiatives like Medicare for All and the Green New Deal, and advocating for the decriminalization of illegal border crossings, Harris has made a swift about-face with little media scrutiny. Her stance has evolved to the extent that she now appears in political ads featuring Trump’s border wall, despite the Biden-Harris administration’s earlier attempts to impede its construction through legal channels. The mainstream media’s willingness to overlook these policy reversals is telling and points to a larger agenda at play.
The media’s partial rebranding of Harris paints her as a defender of democracy, especially in light of Biden’s stumbling administration. This sanitization allows Harris to escape rigorous vetting as she becomes the de facto nominee, only succumbing to public and media pressure after more than a month of silence. Even then, the media shielded her, providing a sympathetic narrative rather than critically dissecting her policy shifts.
Harris’s recent interviews, few and far between, further illustrate her continued radical agenda. She unequivocally supports abolishing the legislative filibuster for the sake of reinstating Roe v. Wade, aiming to enable easier passage of federal laws concerning reproductive rights. However, the Women’s Health Protection Act (WHPA) she and Biden endorse goes far beyond codifying Roe v. Wade—it seeks to legalize abortion through the end of pregnancy, an extremist position that 70% of voters oppose. This proposed legislation isn’t merely about reproductive rights but represents an assault on state sovereignty, shifting more power to the federal government.
Contrast this with Trump’s stance, which respects states’ rights by advocating that abortion regulation should remain at the state level. Trump’s position stands in stark opposition to the left’s centralizing agenda, which Harris’s approach embodies. By potentially dismantling the filibuster, Harris sets a dangerous precedent that could lead to further legislative overreach, paving the way for future administrations to enact equally extreme policies with minimal resistance.
Harris’s advocacy doesn’t stop at reproductive rights. Her voting record includes calls for radical changes to the energy and healthcare sectors, reminiscent of a concentrated push for nationalization. Despite her recent rhetoric about preserving constitutional rights, her past support for stringent gun control measures exemplifies a broader aspiration for governmental control. The media’s reluctance to question these stark contradictions reveals an underlying bias that favors political expediency over journalistic integrity.
The curious leniency granted to Harris starkly contrasts with the media’s treatment of Trump. When Trump makes offhand remarks, the media sensationalizes them, portraying him as a threat to democracy. Yet, Harris’s concrete and extreme policy proposals to override state autonomy and reshape democratic safeguards go largely unchallenged. This selective accountability underscores the need for vigilant and honest journalism, one that holds all leaders to the same rigorous standards regardless of political affiliations.
The biased portrayal of political figures by the corporate media continues to fuel public distrust. By failing to address Harris’s ideological inconsistencies and radical policy proposals, the media not only obscures the truth but also jeopardizes the principles of transparency and accountability essential for a functioning democracy. The discourse around these issues is more than a matter of partisan politics; it’s about ensuring that all Americans receive honest and comprehensive coverage of those who aim to govern them. This truth is paramount as voters prepare to make pivotal decisions that will shape the nation’s future.
Liberty requires eternal vigilance. That's why we work hard to deliver news about issues that threaten your liberty.
