At the Angelina County GOP meeting, the call for Texas to assert its independence rang loud and clear. Daniel Miller, the President of the Texas Nationalist Movement, took to the stage with a decisive message: the time has come for Texans to take control of their destiny and resist the increasing encroachment of federal power on state sovereignty. Miller passionately argued that Texas must take significant strides toward independence, positioning the state to thrive on its terms.
Central to Miller’s argument is the establishment of a Texas-based currency. By creating a separate monetary system, Texas could further insulate itself from the fiscal policies of a federal government that many Texans believe has overextended its reach. Coupled with this is the proposal for an independent power grid, reducing reliance on federal energy regulations and ensuring that Texans have full control over their energy resources. This move would empower Texas to dictate its energy future, free from the constraints of nationwide mandates that often overlook regional needs and priorities.
In addition to economic and energy independence, Miller emphasized the necessity of bolstering the Texas State Guard. An expanded state guard would enhance Texas’s capability to address its security concerns, particularly at the border. Given the ongoing national debate on border security, this proposal underscores a proactive approach to safeguard Texan interests and maintain strict control over state borders.
Miller highlighted the Texas Independence Referendum Act as a crucial mechanism for Texans to express their will regarding the state’s future relationship with the federal government. This Act is envisioned as a way for citizens to have a direct say in whether Texas should reassert its autonomy. The idea of a referendum resonates deeply with the principle of self-governance that many Texans hold dear, providing a democratic path toward potential independence.
Throughout his address, Miller cautioned against complacency, even with an expected sympathetic administration coming into power. He urged continued vigilance and immediate action. The federal government’s tendency toward overregulation, he argued, poses a persistent threat to the freedoms and economic prosperity of Texas. The call to action is not just a reactive measure but a proactive stance to fortify the state’s autonomy against federal interference.
Miller’s speech encapsulates the spirit of Texan resilience and determination. As discussions around state sovereignty and independence gain traction, the push for a future where Texas stands as a symbol of self-reliance intensifies. The ideas presented at this meeting reflect broader concerns about the balance of power between state and federal government and serve as a rallying point for those advocating for a stronger, more independent Texas. The outcome of these efforts could redefine the political and socio-economic landscape of the Lone Star State.
