A former chief justice of the U.K. Supreme Court, Lord David Neuberger, has made headlines for all the wrong reasons. Despite a legal career adorned with accolades, his recent actions in Hong Kong reveal a troubling shift in values, as he seems to prioritize the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) interests over fundamental human rights.
In 2023, Neuberger co-authored an argument advocating for media freedom, emphasizing the crucial role of an independent press in maintaining democracy. He warned that silencing the media undermines accountability and the public’s right to be informed. However, recent events have shown a stark contradiction in his actions and stated principles.
Neuberger was crucial in rejecting an appeal by pro-democracy publisher Jimmy Lai and others against their convictions for participating in a pro-democracy protest. The peaceful protest held at a significant site for the movement resulted in prosecutions that Neuberger deemed “entirely proportionate.” This ruling aligns suspiciously well with Beijing’s agenda, raising concerns about the erosion of judicial independence in Hong Kong.
Jimmy Lai’s case highlights the CCP’s blatant abuse of power, which aims to silence those who challenge its authority and advocate for the upholding of the Sino-British treaty. This treaty guarantees democratic rule of law in Hong Kong until at least 2047. However, China’s repressive tactics reveal its disregard for international agreements and fundamental human rights.
Neuberger’s actions are not unprecedented; his alignment with authoritarian views traces back to 2011 when he criticized free speech on the internet as “totally out of control.” This background makes him a natural ally to foreign regimes that seek to curtail freedoms, including those attempting to undermine Americans’ First Amendment rights.
The resignation of other former U.K. Supreme Court justices from Hong Kong’s final court of appeal further underscores the severity of the situation. Justice Jonathan Sumption cited China’s drift towards totalitarianism and the impossible political climate that impedes fair justice. These resignations spotlight Neuberger’s continued participation and raise questions about his motivations.
Neuberger’s hypocrisy reaches absurd levels when considering his role as chair of the High-Level Panel of Legal Experts on Media Freedom. This position supposedly champions the freedoms he undermines through his judgments in Hong Kong. His willingness to compromise the core principles of democratic justice for financial gain tarnishes his reputation and the broader U.K. judiciary.
The last British governor of Hong Kong, Lord Chris Patten, suggested that Neuberger’s views might have shifted due to his luxurious perks while serving there. With amenities such as first-class flights, five-star accommodations, and high-end culinary experiences, it’s clear that personal comfort has played a role in his decisions.
Neuberger’s actions present a stark betrayal of the values enshrined in the Magna Carta and the legal traditions that underpin democratic governance. By prioritizing personal gain and CCP approval, he has compromised the integrity of his office and the broader justice system. The U.K. political establishment must take a stand against this betrayal and revoke his membership in the Privy Council. Neuberger’s allegiance lies firmly with those who reward his complacency, making him a cautionary tale of judicial compromise in the face of authoritarian pressure.
Liberty requires eternal vigilance. That's why we work hard to deliver news about issues that threaten your liberty.
